The Pods status in ReplicaSet is not correct

[zehuaiWANG]

hi~ everyone, I found that when replicaset gets its podInfo by following code, it only uses the label selector. I think we should add the owner reference judgment to ensure that the pod belongs to replicaset.

func getReplicaSetPodInfo(client k8sClient.Interface, replicaSet *apps.ReplicaSet) (*common.PodInfo, error) {
	labelSelector := labels.SelectorFromSet(replicaSet.Spec.Selector.MatchLabels)
	channels := &common.ResourceChannels{
		PodList: common.GetPodListChannelWithOptions(client, common.NewSameNamespaceQuery(replicaSet.Namespace),
			metaV1.ListOptions{
				LabelSelector: labelSelector.String(),
				FieldSelector: fields.Everything().String(),
			}, 1),
	}

	pods := <-channels.PodList.List
	if err := <-channels.PodList.Error; err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	podInfo := common.GetPodInfo(replicaSet.Status.Replicas, replicaSet.Spec.Replicas, pods.Items)
	return &podInfo, nil
}

What more, I test it by create two replcicaSet with same label selectors：

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: ReplicaSet
metadata:
  name: test0
  labels:
    app: guestbook
    tier: frontend
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      tier: frontend
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        tier: frontend
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: php-redis
        image: gcr.io/google_samples/gb-frontend:v3

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: ReplicaSet
metadata:
  name: test1
  labels:
    app: guestbook
    tier: frontend
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      tier: frontend
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        tier: frontend
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: php-redis
        image: gcr.io/google_samples/gb-frontend:v3

and the view will be:

I wonder if it is a bug, if so, I am willing to submit a PR to modify it.
/assign @maciaszczykm @floreks thanks

Additional, I wonder if the front-end this part have something wrong either in the Resource Infomation:

[floreks]

First see how kubectl handles that. We want to show the same output.

[zehuaiWANG]

@floreks It's not the same as the kubectl output.