Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pod HealthCheck #6145

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 10, 2021
Merged

Pod HealthCheck #6145

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 10, 2021

Conversation

marcosdiez
Copy link
Contributor

@marcosdiez marcosdiez commented Jun 9, 2021

Floresk, please feel free to change the layout as you prefer!

Also, I need CSS help removing whitespaces on the HTTP Healthcheck URI

ps: an excellent container to test this is kube-system/coredns

image

image

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 9, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added language/de Updates or issues for German translations. language/fr Updates or issues for French translations. language/ja Updates or issues for Japanese translations. language/ko Updates or issues for Korean translations. language/zh Updates or issues for Chinese translations. labels Jun 9, 2021
@floreks
Copy link
Member

floreks commented Jun 9, 2021

To be honest I wouldn't want to add so many details to the pod info. There is already a lot of information there and the liveness probe can be easily checked by simply clicking edit and looking at yaml.

@marcosdiez
Copy link
Contributor Author

I understand, but if some users can't read YAML ...
Separating the container from the POD is also not a good idea because they have too much info in common.

What if we get a compromise. Like the healthcheck comes "closed" or "minimized" by default and one needs to click on it to open it ?

Also, to make life worse, sooner or later I might provide you a patch to see the TCP ports of the containers.

My users need that :/

@floreks
Copy link
Member

floreks commented Jun 10, 2021

We have to rethink how to better manage information display as the pod page tends to get quite long already. We can merge for now but soon we'll have to improve it.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floreks, marcosdiez

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #6145 (8116bbc) into master (c1883cd) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6145      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.48%   41.47%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         216      216              
  Lines        9347     9350       +3     
  Branches      159      159              
==========================================
  Hits         3878     3878              
- Misses       5217     5220       +3     
  Partials      252      252              

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1c63eda into kubernetes:master Jun 10, 2021
@@ -22,4 +22,23 @@ import {Probe} from '@api/root.api';
export class ProbeComponent {
@Input() initialized: boolean;
@Input() probe: Probe;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very smart from your side! And I was fighting for hours with CSS. Thank you once more!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/de Updates or issues for German translations. language/fr Updates or issues for French translations. language/ja Updates or issues for Japanese translations. language/ko Updates or issues for Korean translations. language/zh Updates or issues for Chinese translations. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants