Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the name of default backend variable #6544

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

yasra002
Copy link
Contributor

@yasra002 yasra002 commented Nov 30, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:

The name of variable for default backend is wrong. In _helpers.tpl its defined as ingress-nginx.defaultBackend.fullname where as in default-backend-hpa.yaml its called nginx-ingress.defaultBackend.fullname.

I get the following error when I try to enable autoscaling for default backend.

Error: template: ingress-nginx/templates/default-backend-hpa.yaml:8:20: executing "ingress-nginx/templates/default-backend-hpa.yaml" at <{{template "nginx-ingress.defaultBackend.fullname" .}}>: template "nginx-ingress.defaultBackend.fullname" not defined

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Which issue/s this PR fixes

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @yasra002!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @yasra002. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 1, 2020
@yasra002
Copy link
Contributor Author

yasra002 commented Dec 1, 2020

CLA signature done

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 1, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 1, 2020
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 1, 2020

@yasra002 please add a test for hpa in https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/tree/master/charts/ingress-nginx/ci to avoid regressions.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 1, 2020
@yasra002
Copy link
Contributor Author

yasra002 commented Dec 1, 2020

@yasra002 please add a test for hpa in https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/tree/master/charts/ingress-nginx/ci to avoid regressions.

Hi @aledbf !

I have added the test. I am not sure if did it a right way or not. Do let me know if I missed something.

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 1, 2020

@yasra002 please squash the commits.

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 4, 2020

From the logs

2020-12-04T17:23:44.6477984Z 14s Warning FailedComputeMetricsReplicas horizontalpodautoscaler/ingress-nginx-r49d2hfict-defaultbackend horizontal-pod-autoscaler invalid metrics (2 invalid out of 2), first error is: failed to get memory utilization: unable to get metrics for resource memory: unable to fetch metrics from resource metrics API: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods.metrics.k8s.io) 45s 3 ingress-nginx-r49d2hfict-defaultbackend.164d93481059f44a

@yasra002 please remove the new test. Without the hpa the test will never pass. I leave that for another PR.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 4, 2020
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 4, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Dec 4, 2020

@yasra002 thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, yasra002

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2edd489 into kubernetes:master Dec 4, 2020
@aledbf aledbf added this to done in 0.42.0 Dec 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants