Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the force stripping of trailing slashes #7044

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

jdziat
Copy link

@jdziat jdziat commented Apr 12, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

Someone introduced trailing slash removal as part of the force-ssl-redirect annotations. This shouldn't be default behavior.

Types of changes

  • Reverted the trailing slash removal

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 12, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @jdziat!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jdziat. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 12, 2021
@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented Apr 12, 2021

/assign @ElvinEfendi

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jdziat: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented Apr 14, 2021

@cmluciano @ElvinEfendi Any word on whether or not we can get this back to the old behavior. This was a nasty surprise for us during an upgrade.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 14, 2021
@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented Apr 14, 2021

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jdziat: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 15, 2021
@mmiller1
Copy link
Contributor

this would fix #6931

@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Apr 27, 2021

/ok-to-test
/assign

Hey @jdziat can you please track which commit inserted this behavior? I want to see what was the discussion about that.

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 27, 2021
@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented Apr 27, 2021

/ok-to-test
/assign

Hey @jdziat can you please track which commit inserted this behavior? I want to see what was the discussion about that.

Thanks!

The commit originated to comply with the ingress specification for k8s. It just happened to break a lot of things in our deployments.

Commit ID: 493dd67

@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Apr 28, 2021

/cc

@mmiller1
Copy link
Contributor

Is there anything that can be done to help move this forward?

Copy link
Member

@tao12345666333 tao12345666333 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2021
@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented May 13, 2021

@tao12345666333 We can't move forward with this PR the way it is. On further research the reason it was implemented is valid. The ingress working group does not agree with trailing slashes. So I think the best way to proceed is to put this behind an annotation toggle or similar enhancement.

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

got it. @jdziat

/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jdziat
To complete the pull request process, please ask for approval from elvinefendi after the PR has been reviewed.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mmiller1
Copy link
Contributor

I opened #7144 to implement this via an optional annotation.

@jdziat
Copy link
Author

jdziat commented May 18, 2021

@mmiller1 Looks good, going to close this out.

@jdziat jdziat closed this May 18, 2021
@jdziat jdziat deleted the patch-1 branch May 18, 2021 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants