New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cannot resolve external name services after upgrading kubernetes from 1.8.5 to 1.9.6 #4986
Comments
Once i created the configmap https://gist.github.com/rajatjindal/42ef389787bc4fad1f9f506f6d0c51c0 for kube-dns, it started to work. But I am guessing more people will run into this issue after upgrading their clusters. and I am not sure what the root cause is, therefore reported the issue |
I ran into the same issue and followed the same steps to resolve it. |
Ditto here (upgraded 1.8.9 -> 1.9.5 using kops-1.9.0), some Seems that |
The issue seems to be due to kube-dns version 1.14.9, see kubernetes/dns#224 and #4851. I just upgraded our kube-dns to 1.14.10 using the same method mentioned in #3512, which fixed our issues with externalName. |
upgrade kube-dns to 1.14.10, fixes #4986
What
kops
version are you running? The commandkops version
, will displaythis information.
Version 1.9.0 (git-cccd71e67)
What Kubernetes version are you running?
kubectl version
will print theversion if a cluster is running or provide the Kubernetes version specified as
a
kops
flag.v1.9.6
What cloud provider are you using?
AWS
What commands did you run? What is the simplest way to reproduce this issue?
Upgrade kubernetes from version 1.8.5 to 1.9.6
What happened after the commands executed?
I could not resolve external name services anymore
Continue to be able to resolve external name services
Please provide your cluster manifest. Execute
kops get --name my.example.com -oyaml
to display your cluster manifest.You may want to remove your cluster name and other sensitive information.
Please run the commands with most verbose logging by adding the
-v 10
flag.Paste the logs into this report, or in a gist and provide the gist link here.
Anything else do we need to know?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: