-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CloudFormation template is larger than the 51200 bytes limit #8065
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1. What
kops
version are you running? The commandkops version
, will displaythis information.
2. What Kubernetes version are you running?
kubectl version
will print theversion if a cluster is running or provide the Kubernetes version specified as
a
kops
flag.3. What cloud provider are you using?
aws
4. What commands did you run? What is the simplest way to reproduce this issue?
5. What happened after the commands executed?
The stack was not created because the template is larger than the 51200 bytes limit:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/cloudformation-limits.html
6. What did you expect to happen?
The stack should have been created using the command provided by kops
7. Please provide your cluster manifest.
n/a
**8. Please run the commands with most verbose logging by adding the
-v 10
flag.n/a
9. Anything else do we need to know?
I discovered this while working on #8051. This was previously debated in #2259 and #4727.
I thought about it and I see 2 options on how to fix the 51,200 bytes limit:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: