Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tolerate missing detached EC2 instances #10319

Merged

Conversation

hwoarang
Copy link
Contributor

@hwoarang hwoarang commented Nov 26, 2020

Sometimes we see the following error during a rolling update:

I1125 18:12:46.467059 165 instancegroups.go:340] Draining the node: "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal".
I1125 18:12:46.473365 165 instancegroups.go:359] deleting node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal" from kubernetes
I1125 18:12:46.476756 165 instancegroups.go:486] Stopping instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal", in group "X" (this may take a while).
E1125 18:12:46.523269 165 instancegroups.go:367] error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X- X-X.X.compute.internal": error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal": error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX": InvalidInstanceID.NotFound: The instance ID 'i-XXXXXXXXX' does not exist
status code: 400, request id: 91238c21-1caf-41eb-91d7-534d4ca67ed0

It's possible that the EC2 instance to have disappeared by the time it
was detached (it may have been a spot instance for example)

In any case, we can't do much when we do not find an instance id, and
throwing this error during the update is not very user friendly.

As such, we can simply report and tolerate this problem instead of
exiting with non-zero code. This is similar to how we handle missing
EC2 when updating an IG[1]

[1] #594

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 26, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @hwoarang!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kops 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kops has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 26, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hwoarang. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 26, 2020
Sometimes we see the following error during a rolling update:

I1125 18:12:46.467059     165 instancegroups.go:340] Draining the node: "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal".
I1125 18:12:46.473365     165 instancegroups.go:359] deleting node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal" from kubernetes
I1125 18:12:46.476756     165 instancegroups.go:486] Stopping instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal", in group "X" (this may take a while).
E1125 18:12:46.523269     165 instancegroups.go:367] error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal": error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX", node "ip-X-X-X-X.X.compute.internal": error deleting instance "i-XXXXXXXX": InvalidInstanceID.NotFound: The instance ID 'i-XXXXXXXXX' does not exist
	status code: 400, request id: 91238c21-1caf-41eb-91d7-534d4ca67ed0

It's possible that the EC2 instance to have disappeared by the time it
was detached (it may have been a spot instance for example)

In any case, we can't do much when we do not find an instance id, and
throwing this error during the update is not very user friendly.

As such, we can simply report and tolerate this problem instead of
exiting with non-zero code. This is similar to how we handle missing
EC2 when updating an IG[1]

[1] kubernetes#594
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider label Nov 26, 2020
@hwoarang hwoarang force-pushed the tolerate-missing-detached-ec2 branch from a66e180 to 0eb114d Compare November 26, 2020 08:55
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Nov 26, 2020

Thanks @hwoarang!
/ok-to-test
/cc @olemarkus @johngmyers

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 26, 2020
@olemarkus
Copy link
Member

Hey @hwoarang! So we contribute to the same project again :) Thanks

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 26, 2020
@hwoarang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@olemarkus it's a small world :)

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Nov 26, 2020

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman, hwoarang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 26, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ead7143 into kubernetes:master Nov 26, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Nov 26, 2020
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2020
…-upstream-release-1.19

Automated cherry pick of #10319: Tolerate missing detached EC2 instances
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2020
…-upstream-release-1.18

Automated cherry pick of #10319: Tolerate missing detached EC2 instances
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants