Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give kubetest2 its own makefile #10577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2021

Conversation

rifelpet
Copy link
Member

@rifelpet rifelpet commented Jan 14, 2021

This will help avoid cluttering up the main Makefile even further. I'm imagining we could put all our variants, perhaps even grid combinations (k8s version + distro + networking + cloud). That should greatly simplify the periodic job definitions.

Using GOOS and GOARCH for running the kops binary

Also try deploying and testing against k8s 1.20.2. I'm not optimistic based on previous runs but we'll see how it goes this time. I may end up reverting back to 1.19 until we can figure out whats causing the failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 14, 2021
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws-kubetest2

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 14, 2021
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws-kubetest2

Use GOOS and GOARCH for running the kops binary

Also try deploying and testing against k8s 1.20.2
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws-kubetest2

@olemarkus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e109c9c into kubernetes:master Jan 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Jan 14, 2021
@rifelpet rifelpet deleted the kubetest2-tester branch May 5, 2021 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants