Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cluster validation - allow flapping of validation errors #11049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2021

Conversation

rifelpet
Copy link
Member

@rifelpet rifelpet commented Mar 14, 2021

Previously with --wait if a cluster successfully validated and then a subsequent validation failed
(perhaps due to a new critical pod being scheduled and not being ready) we would previously fail the validate cluster command immediately.

This will now reset the success counter that approaches --count, allowing validation attempts to continue until we timeout from --wait.

I'm hoping this fixes prow job failures like this where kops validate cluster --count 10 --wait 15m was invoked at 23:15:48 but exited with failure at 23:22:59 (a duration of only 7m11s). It passed validation 4 consecutive times but failed when a kube-proxy pod became pending. In that case we should just reset the counter and continue validation attempts until we timeout.

In my opinion, kops validate cluster --count 10 --wait 15m should only ever exit with failure if the 15 minute timeout has been reached.

Previously with --wait if a cluster successfully validated and then a subsequent validation failed
(perhaps due to a new critical pod being scheduled and not being ready) we would previously fail the `validate cluster` command immediately.

This will now reset the success counter that approaches --count, allowing validation attempts to continue until we timeout from --wait.

I'm hoping this fixes prow job failures like this: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/e2e-kops-grid-u1804-k18-containerd/1370875829445201920

where `kops validate cluster --count 10 --wait 15m` was invoked at `23:15:48` but exited with failure at `23:22:59`.
In my opinion, `kops validate cluster --count 10 --wait 15m` should only ever exit with failure if the 15 minute timeout has been reached.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 45c2333 into kubernetes:master Mar 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 14, 2021
@rifelpet rifelpet deleted the validate-flap branch May 5, 2021 13:46
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2021
…49-origin-release-1.20

Automated cherry pick of #11049: cluster validation - allow flapping of validation errors
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants