Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use instance ID as node name when AWS CCM supports it #12862

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2021

Conversation

johngmyers
Copy link
Member

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 1, 2021
Copy link
Member

@olemarkus olemarkus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind merging this at all, but this perhaps should be discussed in office hours first?

@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ type ServerOptions struct {
SigningCAs []string `json:"signingCAs"`
// CertNames is the list of active certificate names.
CertNames []string `json:"certNames"`

// UseInstanceIDForNodeName uses the instance ID instead of the hostname for the node name.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently only AWS supports verified nodes, but should we still say that this is AWS specific?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GCE also has a verifier, but it doesn't have this issue of its CCM supporting two node naming conventions.

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

rifelpet commented Dec 3, 2021

This is worthy of a release note since it may be surprising to users

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/documentation area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider labels Dec 4, 2021
@olemarkus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f7e6604 into kubernetes:master Dec 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Dec 5, 2021
@johngmyers johngmyers deleted the instanceid-nodename branch December 6, 2021 01:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/api area/documentation area/kops-controller area/nodeup area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/office-hours lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants