Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Karpenter failure to start on IPv6 clusters #15605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 9, 2023

Conversation

johngmyers
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/addons size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 8, 2023
@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-ipv6-karpenter

@johngmyers johngmyers changed the title WIP Fix Karpenter failure to start on IPv6 clusters Fix Karpenter failure to start on IPv6 clusters Jul 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 8, 2023
@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-ipv6-karpenter

1 similar comment
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jul 8, 2023

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-ipv6-karpenter

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jul 8, 2023

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k126-ko127-to-k127-kolatest-karpenter
/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-ipv6-karpenter

@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k126-ko127-to-k127-kolatest-karpenter

@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-ipv6-karpenter
/test pull-kops-e2e-aws-cilium-ipv6

@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-e2e-cni-cilium-ipv6

@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

I think the ssh all nodes test is ipv4-only. Not sure why it seems to be running only on the karpenter e2e.

@johngmyers
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 9, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 41a0073 into kubernetes:master Jul 9, 2023
28 checks passed
@johngmyers johngmyers deleted the ipv6-karpenter branch July 9, 2023 17:30
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
…5605-upstream-release-1.27

Automated cherry pick of #15605: Fix Karpenter failure to start on IPv6 clusters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants