Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nodelocalcache configure resources #9901

Merged

Conversation

commixon
Copy link
Contributor

@commixon commixon commented Sep 9, 2020

In this PR the NodeLocalDNSConfig is updated to hold MemoryRequest and CPURequest (as it is done in the KubeDNSConfig).

We end up with the following new cluster_spec (as updated in the documentation):

    nodeLocalDNS:
      enabled: true
      memoryRequest: 5Mi
      cpuRequest: 25m

5Mi and 25m were chosen as they are the current defaults.

The reasoning behind this is that we would like to avoid patching the daemonset once kops has it deployed and be able to configure everything in the cluster spec config.

I am by no means an expert neither in go nor in contributing to the kops repo, so if I have forgotten anything please feel free to fire away any comments, additions, requirements or anything else that I may have overseen.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @commixon!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kops 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kops has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @commixon. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 9, 2020
@commixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

commixon commented Sep 9, 2020

/check-cla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 9, 2020
@commixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

commixon commented Sep 9, 2020

/assign @KashifSaadat

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/addons size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 9, 2020
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Sep 9, 2020

Congrats! For your first PR here, you got further than most that tried, without any help.
I believe the only thing remaining is to run make apimachinery and commit the changes.
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 9, 2020
@commixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

commixon commented Sep 9, 2020

Thanks @hakman ! Just commited the changes after running make apimachinery. Let me know what else is needed.

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Sep 9, 2020

I think this pretty much ready to merge. Please squash the commits and force push, to keep things clean.

Add NodeLocalDNS.CPURequest and NodeLocalDNS.MemoryRequest to
configure resource requests.

If not explicitly set, fall back to 25m and 5Mi
@commixon commixon force-pushed the nodelocalcache-configure-resources branch from c6fbc4c to 65610db Compare September 9, 2020 15:41
@commixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

commixon commented Sep 9, 2020

Just did that. Thanks a lot @hakman

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Sep 9, 2020

Thanks for doing this @commixon.
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: commixon, hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8a07275 into kubernetes:master Sep 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Sep 9, 2020
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
…9901-upstream-release-1.18

Automated cherry pick of #9376: NodeLocalDNS config population: small tweaks #9901: Update NodeLocalDNSConfig with Mem/CPU requests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons area/api area/documentation cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants