Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #88872 from smarterclayton/fix_flake
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
test: Properly detect container runtime flake in e2e test
  • Loading branch information
k8s-ci-robot committed Mar 6, 2020
2 parents b0f793a + 8c35e32 commit f5df777
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/e2e/node/pods.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("Pods Extended", func() {
ginkgo.It("should never report success for a pending container", func() {
ginkgo.By("creating pods that should always exit 1 and terminating the pod after a random delay")

var reBug88766 = regexp.MustCompile(`ContainerCannotRun.*rootfs_linux\.go.*kubernetes\.io~secret.*no such file or directory`)
var reBug88766 = regexp.MustCompile(`rootfs_linux.*kubernetes\.io~secret.*no such file or directory`)

var (
lock sync.Mutex
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("Pods Extended", func() {
switch {
case t.ExitCode == 1:
// expected
case t.ExitCode == 128 && reBug88766.MatchString(t.Message):
case t.ExitCode == 128 && t.Reason == "ContainerCannotRun" && reBug88766.MatchString(t.Message):
// pod volume teardown races with container start in CRI, which reports a failure
framework.Logf("pod %s on node %s failed with the symptoms of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/88766")
default:
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f5df777

Please sign in to comment.