-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix nodeShutdownReason for node shutdown e2e #104540
Fix nodeShutdownReason for node shutdown e2e #104540
Conversation
/retest |
@wzshiming: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/kind failing-test |
/assign @bobbypage |
/triage accepted |
I can't find any matching failures for this error message: https://storage.googleapis.com/k8s-triage/index.html?text=Expecting%20non-critcal%20pod%20to%20be%20shutdown%2C%20but%20it%27s%20not%20currently. Test failures for this job all fail on waiting on /configz, so I think perhaps the jobs don't have a valid config to enable gracefulshutdown: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-graceful-node-shutdown/1442540619628023808 /hold |
@ehashman I agree we should eventually remove this separate job and move into serial. However, I think we should first ensure to get this job fully stable and working and only after migrate this into the existing serial tests. I think we still need this change as described in #104540 (comment) The waiting on I will send separate PR to turn it back on for this job for now, so we can get it back to green. In terms of this change here |
PR for enabling DynamicKubeletConfig to fix |
kubernetes/test-infra#23791 was merged to fix @ehashman can we remove the hold on this so we can start fixing the test? Thanks! |
/assign @ehashman |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
�[1mSTEP�[0m: Verifying that non-critical pods are shutdown
Oct 19 22:21:05.208: INFO: Expecting non-critcal pod to be shutdown, but it's not currently. Pod: "period-120", Pod Status Phase: "Running", Pod Status Reason: "Terminated"
from
/hold cancel |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ehashman, wzshiming The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind failing-test
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
The #102840 modified the
Status.Reason
of shutdown, but e2e did not modify it accordingly.Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: