Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove iptables cleanup from local-up-cluster.sh #107450

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2022

Conversation

atiratree
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Docker iptables usage was removed in #106909 so there is no need for iptables cleanup.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 10, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jan 10, 2022

/assign @adisky

Comment on lines 141 to 143
if [ "$(id -u)" != "0" ]; then
echo "WARNING : This script MAY be run as root for docker socket / iptables functionality; if failures occur, retry as root." 2>&1
echo "WARNING : This script MAY be run as root for docker socket functionality; if failures occur, retry as root." 2>&1
fi
Copy link
Contributor

@adisky adisky Jan 11, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove this entire line? from what i have tested, the script is working without root
cc @dims ^^

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, I have tested this as well and we can do without the warning

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good @adisky

@adisky
Copy link
Contributor

adisky commented Jan 11, 2022

/triage accepted
/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 11, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 11, 2022

@atiratree: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e 1bc56fc link false /test pull-kubernetes-local-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@adisky adisky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/skip
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jan 12, 2022

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atiratree, dims

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 12, 2022
@adisky
Copy link
Contributor

adisky commented Jan 12, 2022

/sig node
(don't know which sig this script comes under, added node as changes are dockershim removal followup)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9350521 into kubernetes:master Jan 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Jan 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants