Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add labels when there sig aliases used in approvers/reviewers #107656

Conversation

dims
Copy link
Member

@dims dims commented Jan 20, 2022

found by the new maintainers script

1445:ERROR: file pkg/apis/policy/OWNERS should be in ["sig-apps" "sig-auth"] based on labels/aliases but is in ["sig-auth"]
1446:ERROR: file staging/src/k8s.io/api/policy/OWNERS should be in ["sig-apps" "sig-auth"] based on labels/aliases but is in ["sig-auth"]
1447:ERROR: file staging/src/k8s.io/component-base/OWNERS should be in ["sig-architecture"] based on labels/aliases but is in ["sig-api-machinery"]

/kind cleanup

Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas davanum@gmail.com

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dims: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. labels Jan 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 20, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Jan 20, 2022

/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jan 20, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Jan 20, 2022

/sig architecture

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. label Jan 20, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Jan 20, 2022

/assign @liggitt

/hold for review

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
@dims dims force-pushed the add-labels-when-there-are-sig-aliases-used-in-approvers-reviewers branch from 06571be to 35864ac Compare January 20, 2022 15:02
@enj enj added this to Needs Triage in SIG Auth Old Jan 24, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Feb 2, 2022

@liggitt this one is ready.

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Feb 2, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, liggitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member Author

dims commented Feb 4, 2022

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

3 similar comments
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9b09612 into kubernetes:master Feb 5, 2022
SIG Auth Old automation moved this from Needs Triage to Closed / Done Feb 5, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Feb 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
SIG Auth Old
Closed / Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants