New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extend example to contain --as=... #108835
Conversation
@guettli: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @guettli. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration /test pull-kubernetes-verify |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@slaskawi: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
/assign @mikedanese |
@mikedanese could you please have a look at this small MR? |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
@RyanAoh is there anything I can do, to get this small change merged? |
# Check to see if I can list deployments in my current namespace | ||
kubectl auth can-i list deployments.apps | ||
# Check to see if service account "foo" can list deployments in the current namespace | ||
kubectl auth can-i list deployments.apps --as==system:serviceaccount:default:foo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few suggestions:
- add the impersonation example alongside the existing one rather than changing it
- note that it uses impersonation, so you must be authorized to impersonate that service account
- update the syntax to be
--as=...
(no double-equal)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@liggitt thank you for your feedback. I updated the PR. Is it ok now?
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: guettli, liggitt, slaskawi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: f83ef0e23dcf93bee6b00996551b8e79d095f937
|
What type of PR is this?
This PR extends the help message of
kubectl auth can-i -h
It adds
--as==system:serviceaccount:default:foo
to the example.I struggled to find the right syntax for
--as=...
so I think this willhelp new comers.
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
We want Kubernetes to be easy to understand.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: