New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: implement node inclusion policy in scheduler #108884
feat: implement node inclusion policy in scheduler #108884
Conversation
/ok-to-test |
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/podtopologyspread/filtering_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
More unit tests should be covered, otherwise the feature it's completed. (in case someone would like to review this first for close to code freeze) |
bfe2be3
to
66b0dbc
Compare
/retest |
66b0dbc
to
5e4c8a7
Compare
/sig node |
/retest |
/retest |
/approve |
6b21109
to
d87bafb
Compare
cc @alculquicondor @liggitt api part has been merged. |
Please rebase. |
Signed-off-by: kerthcet <kerthcet@gmail.com>
d87bafb
to
790d983
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, kerthcet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
still need a lgtm @alculquicondor @Huang-Wei |
Did you file a bugs for the flaky tests? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
I tracked the flaky test here #109223 (comment), but I haven't time to dig into the problem. |
Do you hold this PR for special reason @alculquicondor ? |
/hold cancel Please don't forget to fix the 2 doc comments in the v1 package. |
already on the way. Thanks for reminding |
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/sig scheduling
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of kubernetes/enhancements#3094
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: