Promote APIService lifecycle test + 4 Endpoints

[riaankleinhans]

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds a test to test the following untested endpoints:

• replaceApiregistrationV1APIServiceStatus
• replaceApiregistrationV1APIService
• patchApiregistrationV1APIServiceStatus
• deleteApiregistrationV1CollectionAPIService

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #110236

Testgrid Link:
Testgrid

Special notes for your reviewer:
Adds +4 endpoint test coverage (good for conformance)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Release note:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

/sig testing
/sig architecture
/area conformance

[riaankleinhans]

/triage accepted

[riaankleinhans]

/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel

Unreleated flake

 Jul 19 23:13:03.100: FAIL: failed to locate replicaset test-rs in namespace replicaset-570: watch closed before UntilWithoutRetry timeout

[riaankleinhans]

/priority important-soon

[riaankleinhans]

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd

Unrelated flake

[sig-storage] CSI Volumes [Driver: csi-hostpath] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (block volmode)(allowExpansion)] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited while pod is using it
I0719 23:50:47.584] test/e2e/storage/testsuites/volume_expand.go:252
I0719 23:50:47.584] ------------------------------
I0719 23:50:48.249] 
I0719 23:50:48.250] Ran 849 of 7051 Specs in 1769.352 seconds
I0719 23:50:48.251] FAIL! -- 848 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 6202 Skipped

[riaankleinhans]

/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-image-test

Unreleated flake

I0720 00:46:34.510] {"msg":"PASSED [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption [Serial] PreemptionExecutionPath runs ReplicaSets to verify preemption running path [Conformance]","completed":23,"skipped":434,"failed":0}

[riaankleinhans]

/assign @johnbelamaric @smarterclayton

[dims]

/approve
/lgtm

[smarterclayton]

/approve

Caveat recorded here that this may have admin-visible stability implications (because APIService can impact client programs), so if a significant amount of conformers complain we may have to mitigate.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, Riaankl, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/conformance/testdata/OWNERS [smarterclayton]
• test/e2e/apimachinery/OWNERS [dims,smarterclayton]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[aojea]

/approve

Caveat recorded here that this may have admin-visible stability implications (because APIService can impact client programs), so if a significant amount of conformers complain we may have to mitigate.

I think we should revert this