New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kubelet: drop bitArray implementation #111935
kubelet: drop bitArray implementation #111935
Conversation
drop bitArray implementation and use the bitmap implementation from k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/registry/core/service/allocator. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Fri Aug 19 13:42:37 UTC 2022. |
/sig node |
/triage accepted /priority important-longterm generally speaking lgtm after a first pass |
/lgtm |
@thockin PTAL :) |
/assign @thockin I have doubts if it is good to create this dependency 🤔 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, mrunalp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
drop bitArray implementation and use the bitmap implementation from
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/registry/core/service/allocator.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano gscrivan@redhat.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
use the bitmap implementation that exists for k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/registry/core/service/allocator instead of definiting a similar type with the same functionalities.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: