Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

node: e2e: device plugins: Add more logs for clarity #113165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 19, 2022

Conversation

swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The device plugin test in https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-node-release-blocking#node-kubelet-serial-containerd
has been flaky for a while now when it runs on the test infrastructure.
Locally running this test resulted in test passing without issues.

Based on the existing logs, it is not clear why podresource
API endpoint is returning 3 pods rather than the expected
two pods (device plugin pod and the test pod requesting
devices). For more clarity and debugaability on why an
addtional pod seems to be appearing we expose the output
from podresource API endpoint.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related to the issue: #112612

Special notes for your reviewer:

Based on the comment here.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No

For more information on release notes see: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/release-notes.md

NONE

The device plugin test in https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-node-release-blocking#node-kubelet-serial-containerd
has been flaky for a while now when it runs on the test infrastructure.
Locally running this test resulted in test passing without issues.

Based on the existing logs, it is not clear why podresource
API endpoint is returning 3 pods rather than the expected
two pods (device plugin pod and the test pod requesting
devices). For more clarity and debugaability on why an
addtional pod seems to be appearing we expose the output
from podresource API endpoint.

Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 19, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@swatisehgal: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 19, 2022
@swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig node

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 19, 2022
@swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @SergeyKanzhelev

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Oct 19, 2022
@swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Oct 19, 2022

moar logs always welcome! 4 lines all for logging info to track down flakes gets my 👍🏾

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 19, 2022
Copy link
Member

@endocrimes endocrimes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, endocrimes, swatisehgal

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 42c1f88 into kubernetes:master Oct 19, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.26 milestone Oct 19, 2022
@swatisehgal swatisehgal deleted the e2e-deviceplugin-logs branch October 19, 2022 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants