Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for issues related to scheduler performance/scalability #18418

Closed
davidopp opened this issue Dec 9, 2015 · 12 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.

Comments

@davidopp
Copy link
Member

davidopp commented Dec 9, 2015

Benchmarking-related

Performance/scalability improvement ideas

(If I forgot any, please add them. If you do a PR related to scheduler performance/scalability improvements, it's not necessary to add it to the list if it's not already on the list, but please try to remember to mention this issue number so it shows up in the issue log).

@davidopp davidopp added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. component/scheduler labels Dec 9, 2015
@davidopp davidopp self-assigned this Dec 9, 2015
@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

davidopp commented Dec 9, 2015

@kubernetes/rh-scalability @kubernetes/sig-scalability @jbeda @xiang90 @hongchaodeng

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

wojtek-t commented Dec 9, 2015

@gmarek /me

@kevin-wangzefeng
Copy link
Member

/cc @HardySimpson

@HaiyangDING
Copy link

cc @HaiyangDING @hurf

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

cc @rrati

@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

ref/ #18831 (which mentions a bunch of issues/PRs)
ref/ #18458

@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

@kubernetes/huawei

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 21, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 20, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@timchenxiaoyu
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@timchenxiaoyu: you can't re-open an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are assigned to it.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants