-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Retry kubectl test replace on conflict #43192
Merged
k8s-github-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
liggitt:kubectl-test-retry
Mar 16, 2017
Merged
Retry kubectl test replace on conflict #43192
k8s-github-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
liggitt:kubectl-test-retry
Mar 16, 2017
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
label
Mar 16, 2017
k8s-github-robot
added
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
release-note-label-needed
labels
Mar 16, 2017
liggitt
added
kind/failing-test
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test.
queue/fix
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
sig/cli
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI.
and removed
release-note-label-needed
labels
Mar 16, 2017
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-bugs @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews |
It seems it ddidn't "compile":
|
liggitt
force-pushed
the
kubectl-test-retry
branch
from
March 16, 2017 12:39
dab7e31
to
9cd791e
Compare
fixed |
0xmichalis
added
the
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
label
Mar 16, 2017
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, liggitt
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
k8s-github-robot
added
the
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
label
Mar 16, 2017
Automatic merge from submit-queue |
dims
pushed a commit
to dims/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2017
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43513, 43499) Make kubectl replace unconditional second attempt at kubernetes#43192 rather than a retry, make the replace unconditional, which works reliably
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
kind/failing-test
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test.
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
sig/cli
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI.
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since kubectl is doing a resource-version-constrained replace, it is subject to conflicts on a contentious resource (like a node managed by the node controller)
Fixes #41892 (the specific flake, not the watch cache issue)