-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add e2e test for file exec #70756
Add e2e test for file exec #70756
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: msau42 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews |
6097902
to
615c91d
Compare
cc @mkimuram I refactored the DriverInfo to add a capabilities map |
615c91d
to
c3baa95
Compare
cc @verult for plugin capabilities |
/hold |
b4d2df3
to
38e568f
Compare
/hold cancel |
38e568f
to
39abfa3
Compare
/lgtm |
@AishSundar test addition only, would be good to add to v1.13 |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
1 similar comment
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/lgtm cancel |
39abfa3
to
03065a1
Compare
Rebased and fixed the new v0 hostpath DriverInfo |
/lgtm |
/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
/retest |
Opened #71578 for the flake |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
1 similar comment
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds test case for file exec from a volume.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: