Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code cleanup for kubectl taint #70856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2018
Merged

Conversation

lojies
Copy link
Contributor

@lojies lojies commented Nov 9, 2018

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
code cleanup for kubectl taint
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@lojies: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @lojies. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/kubectl sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 9, 2018
@tossmilestone
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 9, 2018
@lojies
Copy link
Contributor Author

lojies commented Nov 9, 2018

/assign @droot

@lojies
Copy link
Contributor Author

lojies commented Nov 9, 2018

/retest

cmdutil.CheckErr(err)
}
if err := options.Validate(); err != nil {
cmdutil.CheckErr(cmdutil.UsageErrorf(cmd, err.Error()))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we've lost the UsageErrorf message here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's fine. This follows the pattern seen in other commands: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubectl/cmd/set/set_selector.go#L104

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Nov 9, 2018

Looks like a small behavioural change around Validate, but other methods do follow this pattern, so I'll leave that decision to the approver.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2018
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor

cc @soltysh for approval

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Nov 9, 2018

/kind cleanup
/priority backlog
/milestone v1.13
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.13 milestone Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Nov 9, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 9, 2018
@soltysh soltysh added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Nov 9, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lojies, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 9, 2018
@lojies
Copy link
Contributor Author

lojies commented Nov 10, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7872a1d into kubernetes:master Nov 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubectl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants