-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add conntrack as a dependency of kubelet #71540
Conversation
- Also update the kubernetes-cni requirement for both debs and rpms to match release packaging.
Hi @mauilion. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@luxas @detiber @dims Here is the change for kubernetes/kubernetes I also have |
/sig cluster-lifecycle |
4e02910
to
dc725b7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @mauilion! Note the dep should only be added to kubelet, because kubeadm doesn't need it directly, but recursively via the kubelet. This is the pattern for all the other deps you see there as well.
Thanks for sorting 👏!
/approve
/ok-to-test |
FIXES: kubernetes/kubeadm#1287 - This commit integrates the work of @jdetiber to fix bazel build //build/rpms and also addresses an issue where not all common versions of rpmbuild have the %{_sysctldir} macro. - Since that macro points to /usr/lib/sysctl.d this commit just points directly to that dir. - This also adds conntrack as a dependency of kubelet for both rpm and deb builds. Signed-off-by: Duffie Cooley <dcooley@heptio.com>
dc725b7
to
2d7b386
Compare
@luxas Addressed the changes :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: luxas, mauilion, timothysc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws |
After conversing, we'll let this through to unblock local builders and try to tackle some broader packaging issues in the near term. |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
This will resolve the kubernetes-anywhere e2e test. In commit: kubernetes#71540 I bumped the required version of kubernetes-cni to 0.6.0 but didn't start packaging it. This resolve that. Signed-off-by: Duffie Cooley <dcooley@heptio.com>
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes: kubernetes/kubeadm#1287
Special notes for your reviewer:
This changes includes a commit from @detiber fixing
bazel build //build/rpms
I am including it cause I had to fix a reliance on a macro that isn't everywhere yet.This change also adds conntrack as a dependency for kubelet and kubeadm.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: