Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[e2e] Decoupling cloud providers from the e2e testing framework #75604

Open
neolit123 opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 13 comments
Open

[e2e] Decoupling cloud providers from the e2e testing framework #75604

neolit123 opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.

Comments

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

neolit123 commented Mar 22, 2019

parent issue:
#75601

tests that a part of the framework and the framework as a whole should not vendor cloud provider code. we need to think of a way how to interface this and possibly plan on how to bundle the resulted test suite(s).

some steps to perform here:

  • enumerate tests that import cloud provider specifics.
  • possibly think of way to interface a generic provider or a generic storage driver or .... etc.
  • plan what tests will move and under what structure.
  • start moving the tests to a location outside of the framework.
  • think of ways how the e2e.test (suite) is going to continue to work and include everything so that we don't break this with the push of button - e.g. compile and run multiple suites but still have the separation in the background.

/area test
/sig testing
/sig cloud-provider
/kind design

/assign @timothysc @andrewsykim
cc @pohly

@neolit123 neolit123 added the kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. label Mar 22, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. labels Mar 22, 2019
@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-kind failing-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. label Mar 22, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented Mar 22, 2019

/cc @oomichi

@alejandrox1
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @alejandrox1

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

/assign @stevesloka

@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

/area e2e-test-framework

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework label Mar 24, 2019
@timothysc timothysc added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Apr 19, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 18, 2019
@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 18, 2019
@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Feb 3, 2021

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. label Feb 3, 2021
@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Feb 3, 2021

@MadhavJivrajani
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-kind design
/kind feature

kind/design will soon be removed from k/k in favor of kind/feature. Relevant discussion can be found here: kubernetes/community#5641

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. labels Jun 29, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

This issue has not been updated in over 1 year, and should be re-triaged.

You can:

  • Confirm that this issue is still relevant with /triage accepted (org members only)
  • Close this issue with /close

For more details on the triage process, see https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/

/remove-triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. and removed triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. labels Feb 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nckturner
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @elmiko

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests