-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "github.com/beorn7/perks v0.0.0-20180321164747-3a771d992973" #77510
Conversation
@wojtek-t: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wojtek-t The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This reverts commit a2ec981.
there are two changes this is reverting:
I'm skeptical 1 is impacting us, because the extra allocation happens once at register time, and greatly improves speed (with no allocation cost) in the hotpath evaluation at runtime. If 2 is impacting our metrics, I think that means we were making use of extremely small sample sizes and were gathering bogus data. That said, the revert is tiny, so we can try it. /lgtm |
This reverts commit a2ec981.
This is to prove whether this is a commit that cause regression in our tests.
For more context, see #76579