dockershim/network: fix panic for cni plugins in IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack mode #82508
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
release-note
|
/test |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
sig/node
|
/assign @khenidak |
|
/assign @thockin @derekwaynecarr |
|
/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big |
1 similar comment
|
/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big |
|
/lgtm The change is safe. And would love to have it in v1.16. However i am not sure why this code path is executed in case of CNI. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
khenidak
reviewed
Sep 10, 2019
bowei
reviewed
Sep 10, 2019
… mode
```
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/network/cni.(*cniNetworkPlugin).GetPodNetworkStatus(0xc000a04370, 0xc000b89a62, 0xb, 0xc000b89a49, 0x18, 0x42edffb, 0x6, 0xc000cfa340, 0x40, 0xc000ced7d0, ...)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/network/cni/cni_others.go:78 +0x420
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/network.(*PluginManager).GetPodNetworkStatus(0xc000a51880, 0xc000b89a62, 0xb, 0xc000b89a49, 0x18, 0x42edffb, 0x6, 0xc000cfa340, 0x40, 0x0, ...)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/network/plugins.go:391 +0x1f9
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim.(*dockerService).getIPsFromPlugin(0xc00029b600, 0xc000c25cb0, 0x40, 0x78c0000, 0x7982100, 0x0, 0x0)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/docker_sandbox.go:335 +0x1c3
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim.(*dockerService).getIPs(0xc00029b600, 0xc000b66cc0, 0x40, 0xc000c25cb0, 0x30bd171a, 0xed508364b, 0x0)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/docker_sandbox.go:373 +0xe3
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim.(*dockerService).PodSandboxStatus(0xc00029b600, 0x4ad8b20, 0xc000c25c80, 0xc000cde1c0, 0xc00029b600, 0xc000c25c80, 0xc0005f5bd0)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/dockershim/docker_sandbox.go:439 +0x133
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/cri-api/pkg/apis/runtime/v1alpha2._RuntimeService_PodSandboxStatus_Handler(0x42c4e00, 0xc00029b600, 0x4ad8b20, 0xc000c25c80, 0xc000c126c0, 0x0, 0x4ad8b20, 0xc000c25c80, 0xc000cb2d20, 0x42)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/cri-api/pkg/apis/runtime/v1alpha2/api.pb.go:7663 +0x23e
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).processUnaryRPC(0xc000a4f760, 0x4b45280, 0xc000b02d80, 0xc000847c00, 0xc000a61b00, 0x78c97c0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/server.go:995 +0x466
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).handleStream(0xc000a4f760, 0x4b45280, 0xc000b02d80, 0xc000847c00, 0x0)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/server.go:1275 +0xda6
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).serveStreams.func1.1(0xc000a8e9c0, 0xc000a4f760, 0x4b45280, 0xc000b02d80, 0xc000847c00)
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/server.go:710 +0x9f
created by k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).serveStreams.func1
/workspace/anago-v1.16.0-beta.1.787+48ca054daba9e6/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/server.go:708 +0xa1
```
Fixes: dba434c ("kubenet for ipv6 dualstack")
Signed-off-by: André Martins <aanm90@gmail.com>
|
/test |
aanm
force-pushed
the
fix-get-pod-ip-panic
branch
from
9aa1888
to
a5365d5
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
lgtm
|
/test |
|
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce |
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
Thanks! /approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aanm, thockin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
k8s-ci-robot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2020
…508-upstream-release-1.16 Automated cherry pick of #82508: dockershim/network: fix panic for cni plugins in IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack mode
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: dba434c ("kubenet for ipv6 dualstack")
Signed-off-by: André Martins aanm90@gmail.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/sig network
/area kubelet
Special notes for your reviewer:
Although this is in alpha, should this be considered a blocker for k8s 1.16.0? Can, or will this be backported for k8s 1.16.1?
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
cc @khenidak