New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch kube-controller-manager to distroless image #91329
Switch kube-controller-manager to distroless image #91329
Conversation
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind |
8a4bd1c
to
ac6674e
Compare
/assign @msau42 @saad-ali @dekkagaijin |
/priority important-soon |
/retest |
ac6674e
to
cbe30f2
Compare
/approve Looks fine to me. Will let @msau42 review and LGTM |
/retest |
/approve |
Does the release note need to be an "ACTION REQUIRED"? |
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
cbe30f2
to
b1742f1
Compare
@msau42 added |
/retest |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance |
Great work, @dims! 🎉 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, dims, justaugustus, saad-ali The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big |
1 similar comment
/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big |
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas davanum@gmail.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
We did the same for apiserver/scheduler in #90674. Withheld this change there to sync up better with sig-storage folks as this was breaking flexvolumes especially bash/shell scripts as the controller-manager no longer has required binaries to run scripts. Please see discussion in issue #78737. The plan is outlined there.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: