Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #95289 upstream release 1.19 #95305

Conversation

bpineau
Copy link
Contributor

@bpineau bpineau commented Oct 5, 2020

Cherry pick of #95289 on release-1.19.

#95289: Azure: fix node removal race condition on VMSS deletion

For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Oct 5, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 5, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bpineau. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 5, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/cloudprovider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. labels Oct 5, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 5, 2020
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/kind bug
/priority important-soon
/sig cloud-provider
/area provider/azure
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 6, 2020
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 8, 2020
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 8, 2020
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

@cpanato could you approve? thanks.

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 9, 2020

@andyzhangx can we get this PR #95398 reviewed as well since it is the counterpart of this for 1.18

thanks

Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@cpanato cpanato added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 11, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Oct 11, 2020
@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 11, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-bazel-test
/test pull-kubernetes-bazel-build

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 11, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 11, 2020

/retest

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 11, 2020

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 12, 2020

@bpineau @andyzhangx There are some build failures can you please take a look?

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 12, 2020

/hold several test failures, will try to investigate

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 12, 2020
When a VMSS is being deleted, instances are removed first. The VMSS
itself will disappear once empty. That delay is generally enough for
kube-controller-manager to delete the corresponding k8s nodes, but
might not when busy or throttled (for instance).

If kubernetes nodes remains after their backing VMSS were removed, Azure
cloud-provider will fail listing that VMSS VMs, and downstream callers
(ie. `InstanceExistsByProviderID`) won't account those errors for a
missing instance. The nodes will remain (still considered as "existing"),
and controller-manager will indefinitely retry to VMSS VMs list it,
draining API calls quotas, potentially causing throttling.

In practice a missing scale set implies instances attributed to that
VMSS don't exists either: `InstanceExistsByProviderID` (part of the
general cloud provider interface) should return false in that case.
@bpineau bpineau force-pushed the automated-cherry-pick-of-#95289-upstream-release-1.19 branch from ec71e59 to 9f01434 Compare October 13, 2020 07:00
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 13, 2020
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 13, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, bpineau

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bpineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

bpineau commented Oct 13, 2020

/retest

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 13, 2020

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 13, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 37babbd into kubernetes:release-1.19 Oct 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cloudprovider area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants