New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix json log format panic, change the flag name in flagIsSet #99257
fix json log format panic, change the flag name in flagIsSet #99257
Conversation
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind |
/hold |
#98524 looks like a culprit. |
Proposed fix, instead of adding
|
eeba35e
to
5b64385
Compare
sure, I have modify the code. |
/retest |
/unhold |
732d895
to
0fdc542
Compare
@chenyw1990 PTAL at the failing unit test, it looks related:
|
0fdc542
to
3d4100c
Compare
I think all comments should be addressed? @liggitt would you PTAL? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks a lot more coherent, thanks. Just had a couple suggestions about the unnormalize func
/approve
/hold for UnNormalize changes
instrumentation reviewer has lgtm once that is addressed
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chenyw1990, liggitt, serathius The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3d4100c
to
edff740
Compare
@liggitt Thanks for your suggestions, I have modified the code based on the review comments. |
/lgtm |
/hold cancel |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind |
@chenyw1990 We're seeing failures in the kOps e2e jobs using CI builds of k8s due to the
however recent CI builds show
Is this intentional? |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
kubelet will panic with --logging-format=json
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #99239
Special notes for your reviewer:
@serathius
@ehashman
@knight42
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: