-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Manual-cherry-pick-for-1.24: kubeadm: apply registry.k8s.io changes #113984
Manual-cherry-pick-for-1.24: kubeadm: apply registry.k8s.io changes #113984
Conversation
Update constants, API types, and unit tests to use the new registry location. Update dependencies.yaml as well.
….io" If the user runs "kubeadm upgrade apply", kubeadm can download a configuration from the cluster. If the configuration contains the legacy default imageRepository of "k8s.gcr.io", mutate it to the new default of "registry.k8s.io" and update the configuration in the config map. During "upgrade node/diff" download the configuration, mutate the image repository locally, but do not mutate the in-cluster value. That is done only on "apply". This ensures that users are migrated from the old default registry domain.
@jackfrancis: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by Release Managers. To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved ( AFTER it has been approved by code owners, please leave the following comment on a line by itself, with no leading whitespace: /cc kubernetes/release-managers (This command will request a cherry pick review from Release Managers and should work for all GitHub users, whether they are members of the Kubernetes GitHub organization or not.) For details on the patch release process and schedule, see the Patch Releases page. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jackfrancis: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f7058b0
to
fd5b824
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jackfrancis: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is a fork of #113395 to unblock CI
manual, kubeadm scoped backport of:
#109938
#110343
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
xref kubernetes/kubeadm#2671
Special notes for your reviewer:
it is essentially a feature backport, as discussed with k8s-infra and sig-release
https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C2C40FMNF/p1666723622759119
kubernetes/kubeadm#2671 (comment)
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: