New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage #114234
pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage #114234
Conversation
Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Thu Dec 1 09:40:53 UTC 2022. |
Hi @TommyStarK. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I know guys you are super busy and this PR is far from being a priority. As a very new aspiring contributor I am still trying to become familiar with the code and to start helping on small pieces. Hope you don't mind. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated 😅. Best regards, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Test coverage increase looks great.
I did a pass on the tests and they made sense to me.
@TommyStarK: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com>
d3bdd98
to
b52d485
Compare
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
Hello @jpbetz Thank you for the review :) I updated my PR to correct the two misspelling that made the kubernetes-verify job to fail. Best, |
/lgtm |
79369e0
to
3576811
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one question about the TTL changes, lgtm otherwise
Add a snippet of the expected error string related to the aspect being tested Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com>
3576811
to
dfdae9a
Compare
/retest-required |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jpbetz, liggitt, TommyStarK The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
* pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com> * pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage Add a snippet of the expected error string related to the aspect being tested Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com>
* pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com> * pkg/kubeapiserver/options: Improving test coverage Add a snippet of the expected error string related to the aspect being tested Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: TommyStarK <thomasmilox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: TommyStarK thomasmilox@gmail.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
If applied this commit will increase the unit tests code coverage of
pkg/kubeapiserver/options
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: