Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #118631: Make CA valid 1 hour in the past #118697

Conversation

champtar
Copy link
Contributor

@champtar champtar commented Jun 15, 2023

Cherry pick of #118631 on release-1.24.

#118631: Make CA valid 1 hour in the past

client-go: make generated CA certificates valid 1 hour in the past (NewSelfSignedCACert). Applies to CA certificates and other certificates generated by kubeadm.

When running kubeadm / installing k8s early during boot,
the CA certificate can be generated before time is synchronised
and time is jumped backward.
Make notBefore 1 hour in the past to accept small clock jump.

Signed-off-by: Etienne Champetier <e.champetier@ateme.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Jun 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Jun 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by Release Managers.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved (/lgtm + /approve) by the relevant OWNERS.

If you didn't cherry-pick this change to all supported release branches, please leave a comment describing why other cherry-picks are not needed to speed up the review process.

If you're not sure is it required to cherry-pick this change to all supported release branches, please consult the cherry-pick guidelines document.

AFTER it has been approved by code owners, please leave the following comment on a line by itself, with no leading whitespace: /cc kubernetes/release-managers

(This command will request a cherry pick review from Release Managers and should work for all GitHub users, whether they are members of the Kubernetes GitHub organization or not.)

For details on the patch release process and schedule, see the Patch Releases page.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @champtar. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 15, 2023
@champtar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @dims @neolit123

@alexzielenski
Copy link
Contributor

/triage accepted

thanks @neolit123 and @dims!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 20, 2023
@champtar

This comment was marked as resolved.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 26, 2023
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 27, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: champtar, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 9ba06a6388b180dde5a8016c19b6217686b06cdf

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2023
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 27, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 27, 2023
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 27, 2023

/hold
/assign @deads2k

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 27, 2023
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 27, 2023

Decided in slack to not change the NotBefore value implicitly, but add a way to specify it.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sttts: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Decided in slack to not change the NotBefore value implicitly, but add a way to specify it.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants