fix invalid log calls

[pohly]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

These were found with a modified klog that enables "go vet" to check klog call parameters:

cmd/kubeadm/app/features/features.go:149:4: printf: k8s.io/klog/v2.Warningf format %t has arg v of wrong type string (govet)
			klog.Warningf("Setting deprecated feature gate %s=%t. It will be removed in a future release.", k, v)
test/images/sample-device-plugin/sampledeviceplugin.go:147:5: printf: k8s.io/klog/v2.Errorf does not support error-wrapping directive %w (govet)
				klog.Errorf("error: %w", err)
test/images/sample-device-plugin/sampledeviceplugin.go:155:3: printf: k8s.io/klog/v2.Errorf does not support error-wrapping directive %w (govet)
		klog.Errorf("Failed to add watch to %q: %w", triggerPath, err)
staging/src/k8s.io/code-generator/cmd/prerelease-lifecycle-gen/prerelease-lifecycle-generators/status.go:207:5: printf: k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf does not support error-wrapping directive %w (govet)
				klog.Fatalf("Package %v: unsupported %s value: %q :%w", i, tagEnabledName, ptag.value, err)
staging/src/k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers/vsphere/nodemanager.go:286:3: printf: (k8s.io/klog/v2.Verbose).Infof format %s reads arg #1, but call has 0 args (govet)
		klog.V(4).Infof("Node %s missing in vSphere cloud provider cache, trying node informer")
staging/src/k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers/vsphere/nodemanager.go:302:3: printf: (k8s.io/klog/v2.Verbose).Infof format %s reads arg #1, but call has 0 args (govet)
		klog.V(4).Infof("Node %s missing in vSphere cloud provider caches, trying the API server")

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related-to: #114568

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fixed some invalid and unimportant log calls.

[k8s-ci-robot]

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[dims]

/approve
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 287b25f6e2c42f622ef08a5c5241afab458d3efa

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, pohly

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cmd/kubeadm/OWNERS [dims]
• staging/src/k8s.io/code-generator/OWNERS [dims]
• staging/src/k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers/OWNERS [dims]
• test/images/OWNERS [dims,pohly]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Jefftree]

/remove-sig api-machinery