-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set the kubelete archived logs permission from 0644 to 0640 for better security #124229
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Set the kubelete archived logs permission from 0644 to 0640 for better security #124229
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Mon Apr 8 01:42:04 UTC 2024. |
Welcome @yong-jie-gong! |
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @yong-jie-gong. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: yong-jie-gong The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/kind bug
/ok-to-test
f, err := c.osInterface.OpenFile(tmpLog, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_CREATE|os.O_TRUNC, 0644) | ||
f, err := c.osInterface.OpenFile(tmpLog, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_CREATE|os.O_TRUNC, 0640) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We potentially break users with that change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, It may break. but it is security issue without change since any user have permission to access the archived container logs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The CIS Benchmark typically has 0644 permissions for Kubernetes components. The concern with changing to 0640 permissions stems from log aggregators and security scanners already needing the 0644 permissions.
While 0640 permissions are more stringent other components within Kubernetes run with 0644 permissions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yong-jie-gong Please address above review comments or close the PR if you agree with them, thanks.
/cc |
What type of PR is this?
kubelet set permission on archived logs file to worldwide 0644, it is security concern. change it to 0640
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #124228
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: