e2e kubectl proxy test: Make future flake diagnosis possible #19968
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's currently unclear if the request failed because the proxy wasn't quite up yet, or if it failed because traffic couldn't get from the proxy to apiserver. Getting the proxy logs unconditionally should help narrow this down.
k8s-github-robot
added
the
size/S
|
Labelling this PR as size/S |
|
Unit test failure is this: #19466 |
|
@k8s-bot unit test this |
|
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 23fd5e9. |
gmarek
added
the
lgtm
mwielgus
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2016
e2e kubectl proxy test: Make future flake diagnosis possible
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's currently unclear if the request failed because the proxy wasn't
quite up yet, or if it failed because traffic couldn't get from the
proxy to apiserver. Getting the proxy logs unconditionally should help
narrow this down.
Fixes #19500 (for the moment-- I was unable to reproduce it in a bunch of tries)