-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flake 26210: decouple explicit access from port 80 #26961
Merged
k8s-github-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
sttts:sttts-flake-26210-decouple-port-80
Jun 8, 2016
Merged
Flake 26210: decouple explicit access from port 80 #26961
k8s-github-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
sttts:sttts-flake-26210-decouple-port-80
Jun 8, 2016
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Flake kubernetes#26210 only happens for port 80. To decouple the possible causes, all tests with explicit port 80 are moved to port 1080 (these were 80% of the flakes). The urls without a specified port (which map to port 80 though) are left untouched. If port 1080 does not show up as flake now, there is really a connection to the actual port number.
sttts
added
area/test
priority/critical-urgent
Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.
area/provider/gcp
Issues or PRs related to gcp provider
labels
Jun 7, 2016
sttts
changed the title
Decouple explicit access from port 80
Flake 26210: decouple explicit access from port 80
Jun 7, 2016
k8s-github-robot
added
size/M
Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
release-note-label-needed
labels
Jun 7, 2016
sttts
added
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
and removed
release-note-label-needed
labels
Jun 7, 2016
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 17e6797. |
krousey
added
the
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
label
Jun 8, 2016
@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 17e6797. |
Automatic merge from submit-queue |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/gcp
Issues or PRs related to gcp provider
area/test
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
priority/critical-urgent
Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
size/M
Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Flake #26210 only happens for port 80. To decouple the possible causes, all
tests with explicit port 80 are moved to port 1080 (these were 80% of the flakes).
The urls without a specified port (which map to port 80 though) are left untouched.
If port 1080 does not show up as flake now, there is really a connection to the
actual port number.