Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" #28558

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2016
Merged

Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" #28558

merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2016

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jul 6, 2016

Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" in favor of "Cluster Federation" and "Multi-AZ Clusters"

@ghost ghost added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. team/control-plane labels Jul 6, 2016
@ghost ghost added this to the next-candidate milestone Jul 6, 2016
@ghost ghost assigned matchstick Jul 6, 2016
@ghost ghost added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Jul 6, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 6, 2016
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jul 7, 2016

Big 👍

@matchstick
Copy link
Contributor

@quinton-hoole @kubernetes/sig-cluster-federation Why did this fail a test by the merge bot? Do we still need this?

@davidopp
Copy link
Member

@k8s-bot test this issue: #27023

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 12, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 791dd21.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 12, 2016

Thanks @davidopp . @matchstick it was a test flake, unrelated to this PR. Could you please give it an LGTM, whereafter the bot should auto-merge it for us.

@matchstick matchstick added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2016
@matchstick
Copy link
Contributor

@quinton-hoole Sorry for the delay. I read the changes. Looks Good!

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 12, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 791dd21.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 629f3c1 into kubernetes:master Jul 12, 2016
xingzhou pushed a commit to xingzhou/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2016
Merge pull request kubernetes#28558 from quinton-hoole/2016-07-06-exc…
5248158 
…ise-ubernetes-from-main-repo

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" 

Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" in favor of "Cluster Federation" and  "Multi-AZ Clusters"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@matchstick matchstick

Labels
kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
next-candidate
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@dims @matchstick @davidopp @k8s-bot @k8s-github-robot @googlebot