Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gce/util: $replica-pd --> $replica_pd #33039

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2016

Conversation

colhom
Copy link

@colhom colhom commented Sep 19, 2016

\cc @quinton-hoole @madhusudancs

fixes #32997


This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Can a kubernetes member verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply with "@k8s-bot ok to test" on its own line.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

While we transition away from the Jenkins GitHub PR Builder plugin, "ok to test" commenters will need to be on the admin list defined in this file.

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot ok to test

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm:


Review status: 0 of 1 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@madhusudancs madhusudancs added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 19, 2016
@madhusudancs madhusudancs added this to the pre-1.5-general milestone Sep 19, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. label Sep 19, 2016
@madhusudancs madhusudancs added area/cluster-federation release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. release-note-label-needed labels Sep 19, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Sep 19, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit acd7f50.

@ghost ghost added the cherrypick-candidate label Sep 19, 2016
@k8s-cherrypick-bot
Copy link

Removing label cherrypick-candidate because no release milestone was set. This is an invalid state and thus this PR is not being considered for cherry-pick to any release branch. Please add an appropriate release milestone and then re-add the label.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 19, 2016

@k8s-bot federation gce e2e test this

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins GCE e2e failed for commit acd7f50.

The magic incantation to run this job again is @k8s-bot gce e2e test this. Please help us cut down flakes by linking to an open flake issue when you hit one in your PR.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 20, 2016

@k8s-bot test this issue #IGNORE

@pwittrock pwittrock added the priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. label Sep 20, 2016
@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

@k8s-bot unit test this issue: #32770

@pwittrock pwittrock modified the milestones: v1.4, pre-1.5-general Sep 20, 2016
@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

@madhusudancs @colhom Is this supposed to get cherrypicked into 1.4? This references a launch blocking issues for 1.4. Is that issue not launch blocking, or is this a launch blocking PR?

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

@pwittrock this is not exactly a release blocker. This is in kube-down. In some small set of cases, users can hit this code path if the previous kube-up run failed to clean up resources during an earlier run correctly. I don't see it as that big of an issue, but it might look bad if the user actually hits this. I would like to get this cherry-picked, but I wouldn't hold the release. Can go in a patch release.

@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

Does this fix #32997? Is #32997 a release blocker?

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

#32997 is not a release blocker.

@pwittrock pwittrock added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 21, 2016
@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot unit test this issue: #IGNORE

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 01dd125 into kubernetes:master Sep 21, 2016
@janetkuo
Copy link
Member

@madhusudancs @pwittrock Do we need to cherrypick this? $replica_pd does not exist in 1.4 code https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.4/cluster/gce/util.sh#L1191-L1198

@pwittrock pwittrock removed cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cherrypick-candidate labels Sep 21, 2016
@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

@janetkuo Talked to @pwittrock about this. If the original code isn't in v1.4 we don't have to cherry pick this.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 22, 2016

Yes, I can confirm that the bug that this PR fixes was never cherrypicked into v1.4 branch, so no need for this fix to be cherrypicked either.

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2016
…33039-upstream-release-1.4

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Automated cherry pick of #32658 #33039

Cherry pick of #32658 #33039 on release-1.4.

#32658: Fixed #32366: wrong master pd name during kube-down.
#33039: gce/util: $replica-pd --> $replica_pd
shyamjvs pushed a commit to shyamjvs/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2016
…f-#32658-kubernetes#33039-upstream-release-1.4

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#32658 kubernetes#33039

Cherry pick of kubernetes#32658 kubernetes#33039 on release-1.4.

kubernetes#32658: Fixed kubernetes#32366: wrong master pd name during kube-down.
kubernetes#33039: gce/util: $replica-pd --> $replica_pd
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
10 participants