Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add retry loop around check for /etc/hosts contents to work around issue #34256 #34357

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2016
Merged

Add retry loop around check for /etc/hosts contents to work around issue #34256 #34357

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2016

Conversation

bowei
Copy link
Member

@bowei bowei commented Oct 7, 2016 •
edited
Loading

See #34256

fixes #27023

This change is Reviewable

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Oct 7, 2016
@freehan freehan added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Oct 7, 2016
@freehan
Copy link
Contributor

freehan commented Oct 7, 2016

LGTM

@freehan freehan added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2016
@bowei
Copy link
Member Author

bowei commented Oct 7, 2016

@k8s-bot kubemark e2e test this

@fejta fejta assigned freehan and unassigned fejta Oct 7, 2016
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins Kubemark GCE e2e failed for commit c3f591a. Full PR test history.

The magic incantation to run this job again is @k8s-bot kubemark e2e test this. Please help us cut down flakes by linking to an open flake issue when you hit one in your PR.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

6 similar comments
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit c8668df into kubernetes:master Oct 8, 2016
@bowei bowei deleted the flake-fix-27023 branch October 23, 2016 06:58
@ncdc ncdc mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@freehan freehan

Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[k8s.io] KubeletManagedEtcHosts should test kubelet managed /etc/hosts file {Kubernetes e2e suite}
6 participants
@bowei @freehan @k8s-ci-robot @k8s-github-robot @fejta @googlebot