New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix typo #44323
fix typo #44323
Conversation
Hi @wanghaoran1988. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ func (s *SchedulerServer) AddFlags(fs *pflag.FlagSet) { | |||
fs.Int32Var(&s.Port, "port", s.Port, "The port that the scheduler's http service runs on") | |||
fs.StringVar(&s.Address, "address", s.Address, "The IP address to serve on (set to 0.0.0.0 for all interfaces)") | |||
fs.StringVar(&s.AlgorithmProvider, "algorithm-provider", s.AlgorithmProvider, "The scheduling algorithm provider to use, one of: "+factory.ListAlgorithmProviders()) | |||
fs.StringVar(&s.PolicyConfigFile, "policy-config-file", s.PolicyConfigFile, "File with scheduler policy configuration. This file is used if policy ConfigMap is not provided or --use-legacy-policy-config==true") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am fine with the change, but these were intentional. I meant to say "if" --use-legacy-policy-config is true.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsalamat It's ok if were intentinal, just make me/user confused, as when we run the command, the option should be used with single "=".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I have no strong preference.
@k8s-bot ok to test |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, wanghaoran1988
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
@wanghaoran1988 PR needs rebase |
This PR hasn't been active in 30 days. It will be closed in 59 days (Jul 11, 2017). cc @bsalamat @davidopp @wanghaoran1988 You can add 'keep-open' label to prevent this from happening, or add a comment to keep it open another 90 days |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix typo, should be single "="
Release note: