Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check dup NodePort with protocols when update services #49258

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 13, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
57 changes: 41 additions & 16 deletions pkg/registry/core/service/rest.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,6 +61,16 @@ type REST struct {
proxyTransport http.RoundTripper
}

// ServiceNodePort includes protocol and port number of a service NodePort.
type ServiceNodePort struct {
// The IP protocol for this port. Supports "TCP" and "UDP".
Protocol api.Protocol

// The port on each node on which this service is exposed.
// Default is to auto-allocate a port if the ServiceType of this Service requires one.
NodePort int32
}

// NewStorage returns a new REST.
func NewStorage(registry Registry, endpoints endpoint.Registry, serviceIPs ipallocator.Interface,
serviceNodePorts portallocator.Interface, proxyTransport http.RoundTripper) *ServiceRest {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -437,7 +447,7 @@ func (rs *REST) ResourceLocation(ctx genericapirequest.Context, id string) (*url

// This is O(N), but we expect haystack to be small;
// so small that we expect a linear search to be faster
func contains(haystack []int, needle int) bool {
func containsNumber(haystack []int, needle int) bool {
for _, v := range haystack {
if v == needle {
return true
Expand All @@ -446,6 +456,17 @@ func contains(haystack []int, needle int) bool {
return false
}

// This is O(N), but we expect serviceNodePorts to be small;
// so small that we expect a linear search to be faster
func containsNodePort(serviceNodePorts []ServiceNodePort, serviceNodePort ServiceNodePort) bool {
for _, snp := range serviceNodePorts {
if snp == serviceNodePort {
return true
}
}
return false
}

func CollectServiceNodePorts(service *api.Service) []int {
servicePorts := []int{}
for i := range service.Spec.Ports {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -569,44 +590,48 @@ func (rs *REST) initNodePorts(service *api.Service, nodePortOp *portallocator.Po
}

func (rs *REST) updateNodePorts(oldService, newService *api.Service, nodePortOp *portallocator.PortAllocationOperation) error {
oldNodePorts := CollectServiceNodePorts(oldService)
oldNodePortsNumbers := CollectServiceNodePorts(oldService)
newNodePorts := []ServiceNodePort{}
portAllocated := map[int]bool{}

newNodePorts := []int{}
for i := range newService.Spec.Ports {
servicePort := &newService.Spec.Ports[i]
nodePort := int(servicePort.NodePort)
if nodePort != 0 {
if !contains(oldNodePorts, nodePort) {
err := nodePortOp.Allocate(nodePort)
nodePort := ServiceNodePort{Protocol: servicePort.Protocol, NodePort: servicePort.NodePort}
if nodePort.NodePort != 0 {
if !containsNumber(oldNodePortsNumbers, int(nodePort.NodePort)) && !portAllocated[int(nodePort.NodePort)] {
err := nodePortOp.Allocate(int(nodePort.NodePort))
if err != nil {
el := field.ErrorList{field.Invalid(field.NewPath("spec", "ports").Index(i).Child("nodePort"), nodePort, err.Error())}
el := field.ErrorList{field.Invalid(field.NewPath("spec", "ports").Index(i).Child("nodePort"), nodePort.NodePort, err.Error())}
return errors.NewInvalid(api.Kind("Service"), newService.Name, el)
}
portAllocated[int(nodePort.NodePort)] = true
}
} else {
nodePort, err := nodePortOp.AllocateNext()
nodePortNumber, err := nodePortOp.AllocateNext()
if err != nil {
// TODO: what error should be returned here? It's not a
// field-level validation failure (the field is valid), and it's
// not really an internal error.
return errors.NewInternalError(fmt.Errorf("failed to allocate a nodePort: %v", err))
}
servicePort.NodePort = int32(nodePort)
servicePort.NodePort = int32(nodePortNumber)
nodePort.NodePort = servicePort.NodePort
}
// Detect duplicate node ports; this should have been caught by validation, so we panic
if contains(newNodePorts, nodePort) {
panic("duplicate node port")
if containsNodePort(newNodePorts, nodePort) {
return fmt.Errorf("duplicate nodePort: %v", nodePort)
}
newNodePorts = append(newNodePorts, nodePort)
}

newNodePortsNumbers := CollectServiceNodePorts(newService)

// The comparison loops are O(N^2), but we don't expect N to be huge
// (there's a hard-limit at 2^16, because they're ports; and even 4 ports would be a lot)
for _, oldNodePort := range oldNodePorts {
if contains(newNodePorts, oldNodePort) {
for _, oldNodePortNumber := range oldNodePortsNumbers {
if containsNumber(newNodePortsNumbers, oldNodePortNumber) {
continue
}
nodePortOp.ReleaseDeferred(oldNodePort)
nodePortOp.ReleaseDeferred(int(oldNodePortNumber))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this cause problems if the same port number is released twice?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this will cause problems. If the same port number is released twice, nothing will happen. Hope the below code I find is the right place.

// Release releases the item back to the pool. Releasing an
// unallocated item or an item out of the range is a no-op and
// returns no error.
func (r *AllocationBitmap) Release(offset int) error {
r.lock.Lock()
defer r.lock.Unlock()
if r.allocated.Bit(offset) == 0 {
return nil
}
r.allocated = r.allocated.SetBit(r.allocated, offset, 0)
r.count--
return nil
}

}

return nil
Expand Down
86 changes: 86 additions & 0 deletions pkg/registry/core/service/rest_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1570,6 +1570,92 @@ func TestUpdateNodePorts(t *testing.T) {
},
expectSpecifiedNodePorts: []int{},
},
{
name: "Add new ServicePort with a different protocol without changing port numbers",
oldService: &api.Service{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo"},
Spec: api.ServiceSpec{
Selector: map[string]string{"bar": "baz"},
SessionAffinity: api.ServiceAffinityNone,
Type: api.ServiceTypeNodePort,
Ports: []api.ServicePort{
{
Name: "port-tcp",
Port: 53,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
Protocol: api.ProtocolTCP,
NodePort: 30053,
},
},
},
},
newService: &api.Service{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo"},
Spec: api.ServiceSpec{
Selector: map[string]string{"bar": "baz"},
SessionAffinity: api.ServiceAffinityNone,
Type: api.ServiceTypeNodePort,
Ports: []api.ServicePort{
{
Name: "port-tcp",
Port: 53,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
Protocol: api.ProtocolTCP,
NodePort: 30053,
},
{
Name: "port-udp",
Port: 53,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
Protocol: api.ProtocolUDP,
NodePort: 30053,
},
},
},
},
expectSpecifiedNodePorts: []int{30053, 30053},
},
{
name: "Change service type from ClusterIP to NodePort with same NodePort number but different protocols",
oldService: &api.Service{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo"},
Spec: api.ServiceSpec{
Selector: map[string]string{"bar": "baz"},
SessionAffinity: api.ServiceAffinityNone,
Type: api.ServiceTypeClusterIP,
Ports: []api.ServicePort{{
Port: 53,
Protocol: api.ProtocolTCP,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
}},
},
},
newService: &api.Service{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo"},
Spec: api.ServiceSpec{
Selector: map[string]string{"bar": "baz"},
SessionAffinity: api.ServiceAffinityNone,
Type: api.ServiceTypeNodePort,
Ports: []api.ServicePort{
{
Name: "port-tcp",
Port: 53,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
Protocol: api.ProtocolTCP,
NodePort: 30053,
},
{
Name: "port-udp",
Port: 53,
TargetPort: intstr.FromInt(6502),
Protocol: api.ProtocolUDP,
NodePort: 30053,
},
},
},
},
expectSpecifiedNodePorts: []int{30053, 30053},
},
}

for _, test := range testCases {
Expand Down
47 changes: 47 additions & 0 deletions test/e2e/network/service.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -803,6 +803,53 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("Services", func() {
}
})

It("should be able to update NodePorts with two same port numbers but different protocols", func() {
serviceName := "nodeport-update-service"
ns := f.Namespace.Name
jig := framework.NewServiceTestJig(cs, serviceName)

By("creating a TCP service " + serviceName + " with type=ClusterIP in namespace " + ns)
tcpService := jig.CreateTCPServiceOrFail(ns, nil)
defer func() {
framework.Logf("Cleaning up the updating NodePorts test service")
err := cs.Core().Services(ns).Delete(serviceName, nil)
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
}()
jig.SanityCheckService(tcpService, v1.ServiceTypeClusterIP)
svcPort := int(tcpService.Spec.Ports[0].Port)
framework.Logf("service port TCP: %d", svcPort)

// Change the services to NodePort and add a UDP port.

By("changing the TCP service to type=NodePort and add a UDP port")
newService := jig.UpdateServiceOrFail(ns, tcpService.Name, func(s *v1.Service) {
s.Spec.Type = v1.ServiceTypeNodePort
s.Spec.Ports = []v1.ServicePort{
{
Name: "tcp-port",
Port: 80,
Protocol: v1.ProtocolTCP,
},
{
Name: "udp-port",
Port: 80,
Protocol: v1.ProtocolUDP,
},
}
})
jig.SanityCheckService(newService, v1.ServiceTypeNodePort)
if len(newService.Spec.Ports) != 2 {
framework.Failf("new service should have two Ports")
}
for _, port := range newService.Spec.Ports {
if port.NodePort == 0 {
framework.Failf("new service failed to allocate NodePort for Port %s", port.Name)
}

framework.Logf("new service allocates NodePort %d for Port %s", port.NodePort, port.Name)
}
})

It("should be able to change the type from ExternalName to ClusterIP", func() {
serviceName := "externalname-service"
ns := f.Namespace.Name
Expand Down