Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/factory) #63666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2018
Merged

use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/factory) #63666

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2018

Conversation

xchapter7x
Copy link
Contributor

@xchapter7x xchapter7x commented May 10, 2018 •
edited
Loading

What this PR does / why we need it: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):

Special notes for your reviewer:
breaks up PR: #63281
/ref #63267

Release note:

This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. labels May 10, 2018
@xchapter7x xchapter7x mentioned this pull request May 10, 2018
Closed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels May 10, 2018
@xchapter7x xchapter7x changed the title [WIP] use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/factory) use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/factory) May 10, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 10, 2018
@xchapter7x xchapter7x mentioned this pull request May 11, 2018
Closed
misterikkit
misterikkit reviewed May 11, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@misterikkit misterikkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having "Fixes" in the PR description will close the parent issue as soon as this PR is merged. Suggest just /ref the issue instead.

pkg/scheduler/factory/cache_comparer_test.go
for _, nodeName := range test.cached {
nodeInfo[nodeName] = &schedulercache.NodeInfo{}
}
func testCompareNodes(actual, cached, missing, redundant []string, t *testing.T) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this helper is called from only one place, why not have the code inline in the anonymous function? (also, helper name is confusingly similar to test name)

pkg/scheduler/factory/factory_test.go
}

}

func TestSkipPodUpdate(t *testing.T) {
for _, test := range []struct {
table := []struct {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see there's already a mix of 'table' and 'tests' in this file. I'd prefer 'tests' in general. Please use that in lines that you are modifying. I'd say you don't have to worry about existing uses of 'table' if you are not touching those lines.

pkg/scheduler/factory/plugins_test.go
}
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
if !validName.MatchString(name) {
t.Errorf("should be a valid algorithm name but is not valid.")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the subtest replaces some special chars with underscore, I wonder if we should keep the old format string here. WDYT?

@misterikkit
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 11, 2018
@misterikkit
Copy link

FYI: internal cleanups probably do not need release notes.

@xchapter7x
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-bazel-test
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Jul 18, 2018

/assign @misterikkit
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 18, 2018
@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 18, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, k82cn, xchapter7x

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58487, 63666). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 357decc into kubernetes:master Jul 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@misterikkit misterikkit misterikkit left review comments

@bsalamat bsalamat Awaiting requested review from bsalamat

@jayunit100 jayunit100 Awaiting requested review from jayunit100

Assignees

@misterikkit misterikkit

@bsalamat bsalamat

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@xchapter7x @misterikkit @k82cn @bsalamat @k8s-ci-robot @fejta-bot @k8s-github-robot