Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We have had user reports that look like hash conflicts. Expand the hash to 10 digits. #6615

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 9, 2015

Conversation

brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@thockin thockin added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 9, 2015
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Apr 9, 2015

LGTM

lavalamp added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2015
We have had user reports that look like hash conflicts.  Expand the hash to 10 digits.
@lavalamp lavalamp merged commit c8ad772 into kubernetes:master Apr 9, 2015
zmerlynn added a commit to zmerlynn/kubernetes that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Also by pre-staging and pushing all at once, and by doing the ACL
modify in parallel, this shaves the push time down anyways, despite
the extra I/O.

Along the way: Updates to longer hashes ala kubernetes#6615
@brendandburns brendandburns deleted the hash branch August 7, 2015 04:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants