New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apiextensions: improve patch integration test #67637
Conversation
@sttts: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
3ce7c54
to
38ae874
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sttts The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -711,6 +728,26 @@ func TestPatch(t *testing.T) { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func expectInt64(t *testing.T, obj map[string]interface{}, value int64, pth ...string) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we add this in helpers.go
? Looks super useful honestly.
patch := []byte(`{"num": {"num2":999}}`) | ||
createdNoxuInstance, err = noxuNamespacedResourceClient.Patch("foo", types.MergePatchType, patch, metav1.UpdateOptions{}) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err) | ||
} | ||
expectInt64(t, createdNoxuInstance.UnstructuredContent(), 999, "num", "num2") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should also add this for TestSubresourcePatch
for consistency
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you do that in a follow-up? Feel free to move the helpers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure.
@sttts: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@sttts: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Picked into #67562. Closing this. /close |
Depends on #67635 for being green.