Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix snapshotter rbac rules #80816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2019

Conversation

msau42
Copy link
Member

@msau42 msau42 commented Jul 31, 2019

What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:
Newest version of snapshotter added the status subresource

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #
Addresses #80717

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Change-Id: Ic6ebec87fd6d230a8e6cc2998df4b20d7a04a02b
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 31, 2019
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Jul 31, 2019

@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
/assign @xing-yang

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 31, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jul 31, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msau42

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 31, 2019
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 31, 2019
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Jul 31, 2019

/retest

1 similar comment
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Jul 31, 2019

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants