Automated cherry pick of #78601: change aws encryptedCheck to exponential backoff

[melnikalex]

Cherry pick of #78601 on release-1.14.

#78601: change aws encryptedCheck to exponential backoff

For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@melnikalex: All 'parent' PRs of a cherry-pick PR must have one of the "release-note" or "release-note-action-required" labels, or this PR must follow the standard/parent release note labeling requirement.

The following parent PRs have neither the "release-note" nor the "release-note-action-required" labels: #78601.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@melnikalex: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @melnikalex. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[leakingtapan]

/ok-to-test

[melnikalex]

/kind feature (from parent PR)

[k8s-ci-robot]

@melnikalex: The label(s) kind/(from, kind/parent, kind/pr) cannot be applied. These labels are supported: api-review, community/discussion, community/maintenance, community/question, cuj/build-train-deploy, cuj/multi-user, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/gcp, platform/minikube, platform/other

In response to this:

/kind bug (from parent PR)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@melnikalex: The label(s) kind/(from, kind/parent, kind/pr) cannot be applied. These labels are supported: api-review, community/discussion, community/maintenance, community/question, cuj/build-train-deploy, cuj/multi-user, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/gcp, platform/minikube, platform/other

In response to this:

/kind feature (from parent PR)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[leakingtapan]

/lgtm

[gnufied]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied, melnikalex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/cloudprovider/providers/aws/OWNERS [gnufied]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[melnikalex]

/release-note-none

[melnikalex]

@kubernetes/patch-release-team

/sig release

[tpepper]

I'm going to remove the feature label.

At first glance this PR looks odd in that it's marked as a kind/feature and kind/bug. The parent PR says feature, but also “Fixes #77741” and that issue in turn is a marked as a bug. Looks like a bug fix to me and there's commentary indicating SIG treating it as a regression bug.