Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TODOs for removing invalid e2e dependencies #85230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 14, 2019

Conversation

oomichi
Copy link
Member

@oomichi oomichi commented Nov 13, 2019

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The e2e core framework and subpackages of e2e framework are defined.
The subpackages can import the core framework, but the core framework
should not import the subpackages. We've defined this dependency rule
after circular depencency issue happened.
This adds TODOs to understand what we should in this rule.

Ref: #81245

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

The e2e core framework and subpackages of e2e framework are defined.
The subpackages can import the core framework, but the core framework
should not import the subpackages. We've defined this dependency rule
after circular depencency issue happened.
This adds TODOs to understand what we should in this rule.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: oomichi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 13, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member Author

oomichi commented Nov 13, 2019

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance

@oomichi
Copy link
Member Author

oomichi commented Nov 13, 2019

/retest

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Nov 14, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 97225e2 into kubernetes:master Nov 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.17 milestone Nov 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants